The call for national and state-level educational standards has swept acros
s the American educational scene in the last 15 years. Using a language of
competition, fair play and equal treatment, standards advocates have captur
ed a broad spectrum of both conservative and liberal support. Drawing upon
journalistic reports, advocacy documents and interview data, this article p
resents an analysis of interconnected aspects of the evolution of education
al reform discourse, in particular, advocacy from the leadership of a natio
nal teachers' union and classroom teachers' situated responses to ongoing c
hanges. Critically appropriating from Fairclough's analytic schema and comm
ensurable concepts in Silverstein and Urban, I analyze interactional figure
s and socio-political themes involved in the elite and non-elite discourse
of standards, with particular focus on the neo-liberal trope of a 'new era
of work' and associated fears of increasing inequality. I conclude by asses
sing the differing strengths of the two frameworks as well as the role of d
iscourse analysis more generally in critical social inquiry.