R. Lehmann et al., Clinical and technical evaluation of a new self-monitoring blood glucose meter: assessment of analytical and user error, DIABET RE C, 53(2), 2001, pp. 121-128
Our study aimed to validate (against the standards of the American Diabetes
Association and the International Organization for Standardization) the an
alytical and clinical accuracy of the new MediSense Precision Plus Electrod
es on the QID system when compared with a reference method using the Abbott
Vision glucose analyzer. Previous studies have shown that the overall accu
racy of the device also depends on the proficiency of the operator, so we a
lso assessed the 'case of use' of the MediSense system, by comparing the re
sults obtained by the patient and health care professional. Accuracy of the
self-monitored blood glucose measurements was evaluated over a wide range
of glucose readings (1.6-20.0 mmol/l). Between-run CVs (using the manufactu
rer's quality control material) were found to be 7% at 2.7 mmol/l and 4.8%
at 15.5 mmol/l (n = 380). We used the error-grid analysis with target range
blood glucose, then separated the data into different subsets, We found th
at 100%: of all measurements were in the clinically acceptable zones of A a
nd B. All measured values of the MediSense QID system complied with the req
uirements for 'blood glucose monitoring meters', as proposed by the Interna
tional Organization for Standardization. The rating of the patient question
naire showed a good to very good overall rating and acceptance with a short
instruction time. The results indicate that that the MediSense QID/Precisi
on Plus Electrodes is a reliable and easy to use device, which can be recom
mended for the majority of patients with diabetes mellitus. (C) 2001 Elsevi
er Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.