The authors examine two main research issues. First, they focus on the way
in which funds for education are targeted on disadvantage at the level of t
he local education authority (LEA). They explore the relationship between v
arious indicators of disadvantage and national test and public examination
results and find that the relationship between one measure of disadvantage-
the proportion of children dependent on Income Support recipients in an LEA
-has a stronger negative relationship with examination results of that LEA
than the additional educational needs (AEN) index currently used by central
government in the formula to distribute resources to local authorities. Se
cond, the authors focus on the relationship between expenditure and perform
ance and find evidence that higher expenditure by LEAs on education is asso
ciated with better examination results once poverty (as measured by the Inc
ome Support measure) has been controlled for. The first finding suggests th
at targeting educational need could be improved by substituting the Income
Support measure for the current AEN index; the second lends support to the
use of increased expenditure as a means of combating educational disadvanta
ge.