M. Vacas et al., Comparative study of a portable prothrombin time monitor employing three different systems in oral anticoagulant units, HAEMOSTASIS, 31(1), 2001, pp. 18-25
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the portable coagulom
eter CoaguChek(R) (Roche Diagnostics) as a prothrombin time (PT) monitor, a
nd to correlate capillary blood results with those of three different routi
ne methods used for monitoring oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT): capillary,
plasma and whole blood samples. Three hospitals participated in the study
with a total of 235 patients on OAT. The international normalized ratio (IN
R) results obtained with CoaguChek were compared with those obtained using
each of the routine methods. The study presents a good correlation between
the PT monitor and the three methods studied: r = 0.9745 (hospital A), r =
0.9283 (hospital B), r = 0.9136 (hospital C). A simplified concordance test
of the methods results in a nine-field comparison table showing concordanc
es of 87.2, 85.7 and 68.4%, respectively. The absolute difference (mean it
SD) between laboratory A and CoaguChek INRs was 0.0571 +/- 0.2042, with val
ues of 0.04286 +/- 0.3906 for laboratory B and 0.6986 +/- 0.6170 for labora
tory C. These results confirm that CoaguChek could be used as a new method
for oral anticoagulant monitoring, and is in best agreement with the capill
ary blood PT system. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.