Aim: To evaluate and compare the in-vitro shear bond strength, micro-leakag
e and dentine-restorative interface of a self-etching/self-priming dentine
bonding agent with a three-component dentine-bonding agent. Method: For she
ar bond strength (SBS) testing 30 non-carious human molars were used of whi
ch 15 were tested with Non-Rinse Conditioner (NRC)/Prikme&Bond NT (PBNT) an
d Dyract AP and 15 were tested with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) an
d F2000. For the microleakage evaluation cavity preparations were made on t
he facial surfaces of 30 non-carious human premolars of which 15 were resto
red with NRC and PENT with Dyract AP and 15 were restored with SBMP and F20
00. The dentine-restorative interface was examined through a confocal scann
ing laser microscope (CSLM). Results: The mean SBS of PENT and SBMP were 12
.8 and 18.1 MPa, respectively. The microleakage scores showed NRC/PBNT leak
ed on the dentine side in 13 of the 15 specimens examined. On the enamel si
de two of the 15 specimens showed microleakage. With SBMP no microleakage w
as observed on either enamel or dentine sides. The CSLM images show clear r
esin tag and hybrid layer formation for both the materials examined althoug
h SBMP showed better and deeper penetration into the dentine with longer re
sin tags. SBMP showed resin tags measuring about 150mm while the hybrid lay
er measured about 5mm. The length of the resin tags as well as the thicknes
s of the hybrid layer for PENT were pound 20mm and pound 2mm, respectively.
Conclusions: The acid-etch technique of SBMP produced higher bond strength
and no microleakage when compared with the self-etching/self-priming 'non-
rinse technique' of NRC with PENT. Thus it can only be speculated that SBMP
should be the superior in the clinical situation.