Mobility and dissipation of ethofumesate and halofenozide in turfgrass andbare soil

Citation
Ds. Gardner et Be. Branham, Mobility and dissipation of ethofumesate and halofenozide in turfgrass andbare soil, J AGR FOOD, 49(6), 2001, pp. 2894-2898
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Agricultural Chemistry","Chemistry & Analysis
Journal title
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00218561 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2894 - 2898
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8561(200106)49:6<2894:MADOEA>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The effect of turfgrass cover on the leaching and dissipation of ethofumesa te and halofenozide was studied. Sampling cylinders (20 cm diam. x 30 cm lo ng) were placed vertically in plots of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustr is Huds.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinaceae Schreb.), or bare soil. ethofu mesate [(+/-)-2-ethoxy-2,3-dihydro-3,3-dimethylbenzofuran-5-yl methansulfon ate] was applied at 840 g ai ha(-1) on September 21, 1997. Halofenozide (N- 4-chlorobenzoyl-N ' -benzoyl-N ' -tert-butylhydrazine) was applied at 1680 g ai ha(-1) on August 30, 1998. Replicate sampling cylinders were removed 2 h after treatment and 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 days after treatment. Sampling cylinders were sectioned by depths and soil extracts were assayed by HPLC w ith a pesticide detection limit of P 01 mg kg(-1). Turfgrass was divided in to verdure and thatch and analyzed separately. ethofumesate leaching in tur fgrass was reduced by at least 95% compared to leaching in bare soil. The h alf-life of ethofumesate in bare soil was 51 days compared to 3 days in tur fgrass. Halofenozide showed similar leaching with or without turfgrass. Fif ty percent dissipation of halofenozide did not occur within 64 days, regard less of organic matter cover.