Grass pollen immunotherapy: Symptomatic improvement correlates with reductions in eosinophils and IL-5 mRNA expression in the nasal mucosa during thepollen season
Dr. Wilson et al., Grass pollen immunotherapy: Symptomatic improvement correlates with reductions in eosinophils and IL-5 mRNA expression in the nasal mucosa during thepollen season, J ALLERG CL, 107(6), 2001, pp. 971-976
Background: Tissue eosinophilia and infiltration by T(H)2-type T tells are
characteristic features of allergic rhinitis both after allergen challenge
and during natural allergen exposure. Specific immunotherapy inhibits aller
gen-induced nasal eosinophilia.
Objectives: We sought to assess, in the context of a randomized trial, the
relationships between symptomatic improvement after immunotherapy and eosin
ophil numbers and IL-5 expression in the nasal mucosa during the pollen sea
son. Methods: Nasal biopsy specimens were taken from 37 adults with severe
summer hay fever at baseline (out of season) and at peak season after 2 yea
rs of treatment with a depot grass pollen extract or placebo. Biopsy specim
ens were processed for immunohistochemistry by using mAbs against eosinophi
ls (EG2), T cells (CD3), and IL-2 receptor-positive cells (CD25), as well a
s for in situ hybridization by using a sulfur 35-labeled antisense riboprob
e directed against IL-5.
Results: Immunotherapy significantly reduced symptoms (49%, P = .01) and me
dication requirements (80%, P = .007) compared with placebo. There was a 40
0% increase (P = .004) in eosinophils during the pollen season in placebo-t
reated patients, which was inhibited in the immunotherapy group (20% increa
se, P = .04 between groups). Seasonal increases were also observed for CD25
(+) cells (P = .002), CD3(+) cells (P = .02), and IL-5 mRNA-expressing cell
s (P = .03) in the placebo group but not in the immunotherapy group. A sign
ificant correlation was observed between eosinophils and IL-5 expression (r
= 0.5, P < .05). Both eosinophils (r = 0.6, P < .02) and IL-5 (r = 0.6, P
< .02) correlated with symptoms after immunotherapy. Conclusion: Improvemen
t in symptoms after grass pollen immunotherapy may result, at least in part
, from inhibition of IL-5-dependent tissue eosinophilia during the pollen s
eason.
Conclusion: Improvement in symptoms after grass pollen immunotherapy may re
sult, at least in part, from inhibition of IL-5-dependent tissue eosinophil
ia during the pollen season.