A model of bovine tuberculosis in the badger Meles meles: the inclusion ofcattle and the use of a live test

Citation
Gc. Smith et al., A model of bovine tuberculosis in the badger Meles meles: the inclusion ofcattle and the use of a live test, J APPL ECOL, 38(3), 2001, pp. 520-535
Citations number
46
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00218901 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
520 - 535
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8901(200106)38:3<520:AMOBTI>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
1. An individual-based stochastic simulation model was used to investigate the control of bovine tuberculosis (TB) in the European badger Meles meles by using a live test to determine the presence of infection. The model was an extension of earlier models, and nearly all population and epidemiologic al parameters were derived from one study site. 2. This is the first TB model to examine sex differences in disease epidemi ology, and the transmission of TB from badgers to cattle. The latter is an essential step if reactive badger control strategies are to be modelled. 3. Heterogeneity was introduced to the simulation model by the use of a car rying capacity, which defined the maximum number of breeding females per so cial group. 4. The prevalence of TB, and the number of simulated cattle herd breakdowns , was reduced for all control strategies using a live test, namely localise d culling, ring culling and proactive culling. However, only proactive cull ing resulted in a marked reduction in these values within a few years. 5. If trapping efficacy was increased above its current value (80%), this d id not improve the effectiveness of these culling strategies. 6. If the number of individual badgers caught and tested per social group w as doubled from two to four animals per group, then the overall level of ef fectiveness of these strategies could be doubled. 7. The effectiveness could be improved if the sensitivity of the live test was increased, but did not continue to show an improvement above a sensitiv ity of about 70%. 8. Given the constraints of the current live test sensitivity (41%) and a t rapping efficacy of 80%, proactive culling, following the testing of four i ndividuals per group, led to an average of three cattle herd breakdowns per year in the simulation, compared with an average of 31 per year when simul ating the live test trial as used between 1994 and 1996.