Predation on livestock by an expanding reintroduced lynx population: long-term trend and spatial variability

Citation
P. Stahl et al., Predation on livestock by an expanding reintroduced lynx population: long-term trend and spatial variability, J APPL ECOL, 38(3), 2001, pp. 674-687
Citations number
76
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
ISSN journal
00218901 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
674 - 687
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8901(200106)38:3<674:POLBAE>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
1. In recent decades, the Eurasian lynx Lynx lynx has recolonized former ha bitat, bringing it into potential conflict with livestock. We studied the s patial and temporal distribution of lynx attacks on sheep in the French Jur a between 1984 and 1998, during and after its population expansion. We esti mated the local and regional impact of lynx predation on livestock. 2. The number of attacks increased from three in 1984 to 188 in 1989, concu rrently with the colonization of the main sheep range by lynx. During subse quent years, 66-131 attacks were recorded annually (92-194 sheep killed per year). 3. On average, 1.6 sheep were killed per attack. Lynx preyed disproportiona tely on lambs and subadult sheep. A small percentage of flocks (9.5-22.9%) were attacked, most of which (75.2%) were attacked once or twice a year. At the regional level, annual sheep losses to lynx were 0.14-0.59% of the tot al number of sheep. 4. The major lynx-livestock problem was due to clustered attacks in a few s mall areas. Each year, two to six 'hot spots' (33-69% of the attacks) were identified. Hot spots covered 0.3-4.5% of the total area where attacks occu rred (1835-4061 km(2)). Roe deer abundance was higher in hot spots and, eve n here, sheep only made up 3.1% of the lynx diet. These data show that lynx were not killing sheep due to shortages of alternative prey or in response to an increased need for food when rearing young. 5. The concentration of hot spots in only nine small areas between 1984 and 1998 indicated that only a few individual lynx were involved. The reappear ance of hot spots at the same sites, after years of interruption and despit e the removal of lynx, suggested that the ultimate factors causing hot spot s were factors inherent to those sites. Further investigation is needed to identify causal factors with a view to eliminating them. These may relate t o landscapes features, animal husbandry practices or the behavioural ecolog y of lynx. 6. In future, where large predator reintroductions are planned, the potenti al for concentrated, localized, impact should be evaluated and mitigation m easures put in place. For scattered and episodic lynx damage, financial com pensation is the only realistic option at present. In hot spots, the cost-e ffectiveness of guard-dogs or the selective removal of some individual lynx should be evaluated.