The explicit effort to theorize about the process of European integration b
egan within the field of international relations (IR), where neofunctionali
sm and intergovernmentalism long remained the dominant schools of thought,
With the relaunching of the integration process in the 1980s and 1990s, how
ever, IR scholars have begun to approach the study of the European Union us
ing more general, and generalizable, theoretical approaches. This article e
xamines the recent debate among realists, liberals, rational-choice institu
tionalists, and constructivists regarding the nature of the integration pro
cess and the EU as an international organization. Although originally posed
as competing theories, I argue, realist, liberal and institutionalist appr
oaches show signs of convergence around a single rationalist model, with co
nstructivism remaining as the primary rival, but less developed, approach t
o the study of European integration.