A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images

Citation
D. Vergnaghi et al., A use of a neural network to evaluate contrast enhancement curves in breast magnetic resonance images, J DIGIT IM, 14(2), 2001, pp. 58-59
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING
ISSN journal
08971889 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Supplement
1
Pages
58 - 59
Database
ISI
SICI code
0897-1889(200106)14:2<58:AUOANN>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
For the diagnosis of breast cancer using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), one of the most important parameters is the analysis of contrast enhancemen t. A three-dimensional MR sequence is applied before and five times after b olus injection of paramagnetic contrast medium (Gd-DTPA). The dynamics of a bsorption are described by a time/intensity enhancement curve, which report s the mean intensity of the MR signal in a small region of interest (ROI) f or about 8 minutes after contrast injection. The aim of our study was to us e an artificial neural network to automatically classify the enhancement cu rves as "benign" or "malignant." We used a classic feed-forward back-propag ation neural network, with three layers: five input nodes, two hidden nodes , and one output node. The network has been trained with 26 pathologic curv es (10 invasive carcinoma [K], two carcinoma-in-situ [DCIS], and 14 benign lesion [BI). The trained network has been tested with 58 curves (36 K, one DCIS, 21 B). The network was able to correctly identify the test curves wit h a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 90%. For comparison, the same s et of curves was analyzed separately by two radiologists (a breast MR exper t and a resident radiologist). The first correctly interpreted the curves w ith a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 90%, while the second scored 59% for sensitivity and 90% for specificity. These results demonstrate that a trained neural network recognizes the pathologic curves at least as well as an expert radiologist. This algorithm can help the radiologist attain r apid and affordable screening of a large number of ROIs. A complete automat ic computer-aided diagnosis support system should find a number of potentia lly interesting ROIs and automatically analyze the enhancement curves for e ach ROI by neural networks, reporting to the radiologist only the potential ly pathologic ROIs for a more accurate, manual, repeated evaluation. Copyri ght (C) 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.