Women, human identity, and the image of God: Antiochene interpretations

Authors
Citation
Nv. Harrison, Women, human identity, and the image of God: Antiochene interpretations, J EARLY CHR, 9(2), 2001, pp. 205-249
Citations number
70
Categorie Soggetti
Religion & Tehology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF EARLY CHRISTIAN STUDIES
ISSN journal
10676341 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
205 - 249
Database
ISI
SICI code
1067-6341(200122)9:2<205:WHIATI>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Most early Christian writers regard the divine image as the core of human i dentity and affirm that women, who are fully human, bear the image of God. Diodore of Tarsus and Theodore of Mopsuestia are exceptions. Though stating clearly that women share the same human nature as men, they read Genesis 1 .26 in terms of 1 Corinthians 11.7 and identify the divine image as a kind of exclusively male authority. Theodore specifies that the human "imago dei " is a visible viceroy representing the invisible God to created beings. Ad am failed in this task, which assumed man Jesus fulfilled. For Theodore the divine likeness, which women also share, is an imitation of many divine at tributes, including creativity. Theodoret of Cyrrhus moves toward the Greek patristic mainstream, stating that woman is at least "image of the image" and eliding Theodore's distinction between image and likeness, thus includi ng many human characteristics besides authority in the "imago Dei".