C. Duarte et al., Treatment of severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis by a combination of azelastine nasal spray and eye drops: A double blind, double-placebo study, J INVES ALL, 11(1), 2001, pp. 34-40
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIONAL ALLERGOLOGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Background: Evaluation of combined azelastine nasal spray and eye drops tre
atment in patients with severe rhinoconjunctivitis. Methods: Phase LII, mul
ticenter, randomized, double-blind study of patients with a history of gras
s pollen allergy confirmed by skin testing/specific IgE, total symptom scor
es greater than or equal to6 (ocular) or greater than or equal to8 (nasal).
Intent-to-treat analysis. Results 99 patients (azelastine = 53, placebo =
46) enrolled homogeneously from May to September 1997 in 7 venues in France
. The efficacy of azelastine was significantly higher compared to placebo (
49% vs. 28%, p = 0.04), considering response as a decrease of the total sum
of ocular and nasal scores by at least 50% and no use of cetirizine by day
7. The decrease of total ocular and nasal scores by at least 50% at day 7,
with cetirizine rescue <3 tablets was higher, but not significantly, in az
elastine patients (43% vs. 30%). Cetirizine rescue was more frequent, from
day 0 to 7, in the placebo patients (4.9 +/- 5.0 vs. 2.7 +/- 4.1,p = 0.02).
Global efficacy was rated higher for azelastine by investigators (26% vs.
10%,p = 0.05) and patients (28% vs. 7%, p = 0.01). Adverse events were burn
ing sensation, "red eyes," nasal irritation, bitter taste. No serious adver
se events were reported. Tolerance of azelastine was "very good/good"/"sati
sfactory" in the majority (62 %/82% assessed by investigators, or 55%/79% b
y patients, respectively). Conclusions: Combining azelastine eye drops and
nasal spray is a safe and effective treatment of severe seasonal rhinoconju
nctivitis.