Reports results of a study to reappraise the role of librarians in the deli
very to users of electronic periodicals, by examination of a specific elect
ronic periodical service, SuperJournal, drawing on three different sources
of evidence regarding librarians' roles: their perceived roles in the deliv
ery of electronic periodicals, their actions in delivering SuperJournal and
their behavioural characteristics when using SuperJournal. Focuses on four
issues: the librarians' perception of their roles as deliverers of electro
nic periodicals; consideration of whether their actions match their espouse
d roles when faced with a specific electronic periodical; the rating of the
ir use of SuperJournal in relation to their role as information deliverers;
and whether their practised roles had any effect on end users. The empiric
al evidence was collected during the course of the SuperJournal electronic
periodical project and included: a log of site librarian activities related
to SuperJournal; a transcription of librarian discussions during three wor
kshops; an interview survey which was conducted with one librarian at each
site; a 22- month SuperJournal usage log file; and a postal questionnaire s
urvey conducted with all SuperJournal librarian users, to investigate their
views about SuperJournal and their perceived roles in delivering electroni
c periodicals; 68 librarians' usable responses to the survey were obtained
(28% response rate). The librarians see the electronic periodical as a chal
lenge to the library profession in a number of specified ways and, accordin
gly, they espoused a set of roles which they thought would better define th
eir position in the changing scholarly communication system.