The antitrust debate in the United States has been grounded and guided by p
rinciples derived from equilibrium-based economics. However, these principl
es mischaracterize key elements of real economies. The authors (1) explore
the nature of the antitrust debate by reviewing a key component of the deba
te-the efficiency versus wealth transfer argument; (2) illustrate how the e
quilibrium-based tradition has misguided the debate; (3) sketch an alternat
ive, process view of competition that draws heavily on evolutionary and Aus
trian economics (resource-advantage theory; Hunt 2000b); and (4) discuss th
e implications of using a process view of competition as a basis for antitr
ust policy.