Rigid plaster dressings and immediate postoperative prostheses (IPOP) in pa
tients undergoing transtibial amputations have been reported to reduce pain
and healing time, prevent knee flexion contractures, and expedite early am
bulation compared to soft dressings. Yet, despite the reported benefits, su
rgical adoption of (conventional) rigid dressings a.nd IPOP has been incons
istent. The purpose of this study was to determine the current postoperativ
e transtibial amputation dressing practices in VA hospitals. A six-item que
stionnaire was sent to 134 surgeons at the 117 VA hospitals where transtibi
al amputations were performed in fiscal year 1999. Responses were received
from 83% of the surgeons. During the 1999 study year, surgeons performing t
ranstibial amputations used soft dressings on 67% of patients, conventional
rigid dressings with no intent to apply a foot attachment on 14% of patien
ts, removable rigid dressings on 14% of patients, and IPOP (almost exclusiv
ely without a foot) on 5% of patients. The application of a rigid dressing
or IPOP did not correlate well with the total number of transtibial amputat
ions performed by the surgeon, hospital bed size, or academic affiliation.