Ap. Moskalik et al., Analysis of three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonographic quantitative measures for the discrimination of prostate cancer, J ULTR MED, 20(7), 2001, pp. 713-722
Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine whether several quant
itative ultrasonographic measures have potential to discriminate prostate c
ancer from normal prostate and to determine the best combination of these m
easures. The true spatial distributions of cancer within the prostates stud
ied were obtained histologically after radical prostatectomy The relationsh
ip between Doppler ultrasonography and microvessel count was also investiga
ted. Methods. Three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonographic data were acquired
from 39 patients before radical prostatectomy The removed prostate was sec
tioned, and whole-mount hematoxylineosin-stained slides were used to identi
fy all regions of cancer within each prostate. These histologic and ultraso
nographic data were spatially registered. Doppler ultrasonographic measures
were calculated within uniformly sized three-dimensional regions that were
either entirely cancerous or noncancerous, and receiver operating characte
ristic analysis was performed on the results. Microvessel counts were made
within each contiguous cancerous region and correlated with ultrasonographi
c measures. Results. Color pixel density was the best simple measure for di
scriminating prostate cancer (accuracy, 80%). The mean power mode value (no
rmalized mean power in color pixels) was inversely related to cancer with a
n accuracy of 1 - normalized mean power in color pixels = 65% (low mean pow
er is more cancerous). When color pixel density was combined with the norma
lized mean power in color pixels, its accuracy improved slightly to 84%. Th
e peak microvessel count had a negative correlation with color pixel densit
y as well as with cancer stage. Conclusion. Doppler ultrasonography does pr
ovide discriminatory information for prostate cancer, with color pixel dens
ity being the most promising measure.