Background. Iron deficiency remains a common cause of hyporesponsiveness to
epoetin in hemodialysis patients. However. considerable controversy exists
regarding the best strategies for diagnosis and treatment.
Methods. As part of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of intravenous
versus subcutaneous administration of epoetin. we made monthly determinatio
ns of serum iron, total iron binding capacity, percentage transferrin satur
ation. and serum ferritin. If a patient had serum ferritin < 100 ng/mL or t
he combination of serum ferritin < 400 ng/mL and a transferrin saturation <
20%. he/she received parenteral iron, given as iron dextran 100 mg at ten
consecutive dialysis sessions. We analyzed parenteral iron use during the t
rial. the effect of its administration on iron indices and epoetin dose. an
d the ability of the iron indices to predict a reduction in epoetin dose in
response to parenteral iron administration.
Results. Eighty-seven percent of the 208 patients required parenteral iron
to maintain adequate iron stores at an average dose of 1516 mg over 41.7 we
eks, or 36 mg/week. Only two of 180 patients experienced serious reactions
to intravenous iron administration. Two thirds of the patients receiving pa
renteral iron had a decrease in their epoetin requirement of at least 30 U/
kg/week compared with 29% of patients who did not receive iron (P = 0.004).
The average dose decrease 12 weeks after initiating iron therapy was 1763
U/week. A serum ferritin < 200 ng/mL had the best positive predictive value
(76%) for predieting a response to parenteral iron administration, but it
still had limited clinical utility.
Conclusions. Iron deficiency commonly develops during epoetin therapy, and
parenteral iron administration may result in a clinically significant reduc
tion in epoetin dose. The use of transferrin saturation or serum ferritin a
s an indicator for parenteral iron administration has limited utility.