Effect of type of dialysis membrane on bone in haemodialysis patients

Citation
A. Ferreira et al., Effect of type of dialysis membrane on bone in haemodialysis patients, NEPH DIAL T, 16(6), 2001, pp. 1230-1238
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
09310509 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1230 - 1238
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-0509(200106)16:6<1230:EOTODM>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Background, Uraemic bone disease is the result of a number of factors modul ating bone formation and resorption in a complex manner. In the present stu dy, the hypothesis tested was that the type of haemodialysis membrane used for renal replacement therapy might also play a role. Methods. We conducted a prospective, open study in 24 chronic haemodialysis patients who were randomized to dialysis treatment with either cellulosic (CELL group, n=11) or polyacrylonitrile (AN-69 group, n=13) membrane for 9 months. Repeated determinations of plasma parameters reflecting bone turnov er were done in all patients, and a bone biopsy in a subgroup at the start and end of study. Results, At the start. mean plasma intact parathyroid hormone levels were c omparable between the two groups and they did nut vary significantly at 9 m onths of treatment. Similarly, plasma bone-specific alkaline phosphatase an d osteocalcin (markers of bone formation), and cross-laps (marker of bone r esorption) remained unchanged. However, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) progressively decreased from 169 to 119 ng/ml in AN-69 group (P < 0.01), whereas it remained unchanged in CELL group. In addition, the levels of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-2 were increased while the leve ls of IGFBP-5 were decreased in AN-69 group. In the five patients of each g roup who had repeat bone biopsies, histomorphometric analysis showed a decr ease in osteoblast surface, osteoclast surface and osteoclast number in AN- 69 group at 9 months, compared with baseline values measured at the start o f the study. In contrast, all three parameters significantly increased in t he CELL group at 9 months (P < 0.001 for the difference between each of the three parameters). Bone formation rate decreased by 31% in the AN-69 group , but increased by 50% in CELL group. However, this latter difference was n ot statistically significant. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 and soluble IL-6 re ceptor levels did not change in the two groups of patients who had undergon e bone biopsy. Conclusion, Dialysis with CELL membrane was associated with increased bone turnover whereas the use of AN-69 membrane was associated with decreased bo ne turnover. suggesting a beneficial effect of the latter on high-turnover uraemic bone disease. However, as the number of patients with repeat bone b iopsies was small, these findings need to be confirmed in a larger study. F urther studies are also needed to evaluate whether or not the changes in IG F system components play a role in decreased bone cell activity in patients on dialysis using the AN-69 polyacrylonitrile membrane.