Ld. Nickerson et al., A tool for comparison of PET and fMRI methods: Calculation of the uncertainty in the location of an activation site in a PET image, NEUROIMAGE, 14(1), 2001, pp. 194-201
A technique for calculating the uncertainty in the location of an activatio
n site in a PET image, without performing repeated measures, is presented.
With the development of new fMRI methods for measuring cerebral hemodynamic
s, demonstration of the efficacy of these techniques will be critical to es
tablish clinical utility. Comparisons with PET are a powerful tool for vali
dating these new fMRI techniques. In addition to the fact that PET techniqu
es are well-established methods for making physiological measurements in vi
vo,: PET methods are also free of the geometric distortions and nonuniform
signal-to-noise artifacts (due to signal dropout) common in fMRI techniques
. Comparisons reported previously have been limited by the large number of
trials acquired in single-subject fMRI studies and the small number of tria
ls in a PET study (due to the radiation dose to the patient or the intersca
n delays for tracer decay). Our method calculates both the center of mass (
CM) of a predefined region of interest and the uncertainty in the location
of the CM using the preimage PET data (sinograms). Results of phantom studi
es demonstrate that our method is an unbiased measurement equivalent to tha
t of repeated measures with a large number of images. Extension of this tec
hnique to estimate the uncertainty in the location of an activation site in
a PET statistical parametric map,will permit precise rigorous comparisons
of PET and fMRI methods in single subjects without the constraints imposed
by the relatively small number of PET measurements. (C) 2001 Academic Press
.