Ra. Weeks et al., Comparison of auditory, somatosensory, and visually instructed and internally generated finger movements: A PET study, NEUROIMAGE, 14(1), 2001, pp. 219-230
We sought to determine how the pattern of cerebral activation, and in parti
cular in frontal motor areas, during the performance of conditional motor t
asks is dependent upon the modality of instruction (visual, auditory, or so
matosensory). Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) changes with externally i
nstructed movements were also compared with internally generated, self-pace
d, movements. We used positron emission tomography (PET) with the tracer (H
2O)-O-15 to measure rCBF in 22 healthy volunteers, External stimuli consist
ed of the randomized presentation of single or double impulses using a sing
le modality for each condition. In the movement scans, the subjects used th
e index and middle fingers of their right hands to press a left button for
a single and a right button for a double impulse, respectively. In the cont
rol scans, subjects were required to covertly distinguish a single from a d
ouble stimulus without a motor response. Data were analyzed using conventio
nal subtraction techniques with a statistical threshold of Z > 2.33 with co
rrections for multiple comparisons. When the activation differences between
the three externally instructed movement conditions were statistically com
pared, nonsignificant trends toward increased rCBF in the sensory cortex of
the modality of the cue were observed but no differential activity in cort
ical motor areas. Internally generated movements, when compared to external
ly triggered movements, were associated with enhanced activation in bilater
al medial and lateral premotor, dorsolateral prefrontal and superior pariet
al regions, largely confirming previous reports. The data indicate that, on
a regional level, modality-specific processing in a conditional motor task
does not occur in frontal motor areas and is probably confined to sensory
areas. (C) 2001 Academic Press.