Curvature biases in stereoscopic vision: A nasotemporal asymmetry

Authors
Citation
J. Ninio, Curvature biases in stereoscopic vision: A nasotemporal asymmetry, PERCEPTION, 29(10), 2000, pp. 1219-1230
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PERCEPTION
ISSN journal
03010066 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
10
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1219 - 1230
Database
ISI
SICI code
0301-0066(2000)29:10<1219:CBISVA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The reliability of curvature judgments for linear elements was studied, wit h stereograms that contained a binocular are with curvature in depth, and e ither a binocular frontoparallel are or a monocular one, on a background re presenting a hemiellipsoid. The subjects made about 15% errors on binocular arcs with curvature in depth, and 60% - 80% of these occurred when both th e hemiellipsoid and the are were convex, the are being perceived as concave , by transparency through the hemiellipsoid. There were also about 15% - 30 % errors on frontoparallel arcs, but spread among all situations, with a sm all prevalence of concave judgments. Curvature in depth was assigned to the monocular stimuli in more than 60% of the cases. There was a curvature bia s when the monocular arcs were on the nasal side, and were viewed against a concave background. Assuming parallel viewing, nasal ingoing area were usu ally perceived as concave, and nasal outgoing arcs usually perceived as con vex, in agreement with geometrical likelihood. Nasal-side elements captured by one eye are, in general, those with the highest likelihood of having ma tching elements in the other eye. Then the observed nasal bias effect sugge sts that the matching process in stereopsis could be driven from the nasal sides of the projections in the two cerebral hemispheres.