Objective: A comprehensive investigation on the quality of partnership of m
ale patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) after treatment with sildenafil
vs. untreated patients, as perceived by both the patients and their female
partners. Methods: This report describes an observational, cross-sectional
exploratory study comparing ED patients responsive to sildenafil with ED p
atients prior to therapy. Assessments included the 'International Index of
Erectile Function' (IIEF) and the 'Partnerschaftsfragebogen' (PFB), a partn
ership questionnaire used in German-speaking countries. The comparability o
f the two study groups was examined using a stepwise legit model. Significa
nt intergroup differences regarding demographics and history were identifie
d and included as confounding variables in the assessment of Quality of Par
tnership differences using ANCOVA. A regression analysis was performed to d
etermine the association between the mean total IIEF scores and Quality of
Partnership measures. Results: 105 patients were included in the study. Aft
er adjustment for confounding variables, the groups varied significantly wi
th respect to Quality of Partnership as perceived by men (mean score PFB 61
.8 +/- 13.9 vs. 54.4 +/- 15.5; p <0.001) and women (mean score PFB 63.1 +/-
13.6 vs. 57.0 +/- 14.7; p = 0.006). In men, all three PFB subscales (quarr
eling, tenderness, togetherness) differed significantly between the two stu
dy groups. In the female partners, the tenderness and togetherness domains
varied significantly. Erectile function correlated highly significantly wit
h tenderness and togetherness in both the male patients and their partners.
Conclusion: Our data indicate that the Quality of Partnership reported by
both the men and their female partners is significantly better in appropria
tely treated ED patients than in untreated controls.