Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region

Citation
P. Wilson et al., Access to the evidence base from general practice: a survey of general practice staff in Northern and Yorkshire Region, QUAL HEAL C, 10(2), 2001, pp. 83-89
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
ISSN journal
09638172 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
83 - 89
Database
ISI
SICI code
0963-8172(200106)10:2<83:ATTEBF>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Aim-To identify and describe current methods of making health related resea rch evidence accessible to general practice staff in the Northern and Yorks hire Region. Method-A postal survey questionnaire of general practice staff in the North ern and Yorkshire Region. Results-At least one completed questionnaire was obtained from 70% of the g eneral practices surveyed, and the individual response rate to the survey w as 45%. Just under 60% of all respondents reported having no access to the NHS internet and just under 50% also reported having no access to the inter net. All respondents in this survey reported greater access to paper based information than to electronic databases. However, this research provides e vidence of differential access to information resources between different p rofessions in general practice with GPs clearly having easier access than o ther professions to both paper based resources and electronic databases. 70 % of all respondents said that they would need to be trained to use either a computer, the internet, or to search databases if the opportunity for eas y access to any of these information services was available. Conclusions-At the time of this survey, general practices seemed to be stru ggling to set up the infrastructure and develop the skills that are necessa ry to make best use of available research evidence. In addition, there is a need for further investigation into the reasons why different professions working in the same practice setting have differential access to informatio n resources available in primary care.