Background: Since the clinical features of sarcoidosis and tuberculosis may
mimic each other, and that differentiation is not easy on clinical grounds
, a histologic diagnosis may be mandatory in countries where the prevalence
of tuberculosis is high or in populations with large numbers of immigrants
from those countries. previous studies have suggested the minor salivary g
land biopsy as a useful method in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis, The present
study was undertaken to evaluate the value of labial biopsy in the differe
ntiation of sarcoidosis from tuberculosis in patients with enlarged hilar a
nd paratracheal lymph nodes. Methods: Labial biopsy was performed in 50 con
secutive patients with sarcoidosis, and in 35 consecutive patients with tub
erculosis who had intrathoracic lympadenopathy. The files of all patients w
ere reviewed for the clinical presentation, radiographic features, SAGE lev
els, tuberculin skin test anergy, and the frequency of positive labial biop
sy in each disease. Results: Non-caseating granulomas were present in labia
l biopsies obtained from 24 patients (48%) of 50 patients with sarcoidosis,
Labial biopsies were positive in 4 of 6 patients who had an abnormality on
eye examination and in 3 of 5 patients who had noncaseating granulomas on
biopsy material from skin. In two of 4 patients who underwent mediastinosco
py, noncaseating granulomas were detected on labial biopsy. In contrast to
the patients with sarcoidosis labial biopsies revealed normal minor salivar
y glands in all patients with tuberculosis. Conclusions: Labial biopsy has
a high discriminatory value as a diagnostic tool in the differentiation of
sarcoidosis from tuberculosis. Although it has a rather lower diagnostic yi
eld than transbronchial lung biopsy, labial biopsy should be considered as
a first line approach prior to performing other more invasive procedures fo
r the tissue confirmation of sarcoidosis.