Several decisions have addressed the question of whether post-transaction a
mendments or modifications and securities exchanges satisfy the purchase or
sale requirements under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Nonetheless, there i
s no constant and reliable approach to the question of what constitutes a n
ew investment decision. This article analyzes the purchase or sale requirem
ents under Section IO(b) and Rule 10b-5, then examines the recent decision
in Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Anderson & Co., and finally
looks at how economic models for risk analysis can lead to a consistent ap
proach to the issue of what constitutes a new investment decision.