This paper addresses how New York City's workfare program has structural op
portunities for collective action by welfare recipients. As workfare blurs
the distinction between wage workers and welfare recipients, it calls into
question accepted understandings of the rights and obligations of welfare r
ecipients and fosters new claims on the state. The concept of "cultural opp
ortunity structures" can help to explain the political mobilization of work
fare participants if it is linked to a Durkheimian tradition of cultural an
alysis attentive to symbolic classification. The dramaturgic approach to cu
lture exemplified in the work of Erving Goffman can usefully complement thi
s structural approach if a narrow focus on frames and framing process is br
oadened to include interaction rituals and ceremonial profanation.