This article considers the long-term effect of a degree on graduate lives.
By following-up a degree course which has used active-learning methods with
in a modular course for over 20 years, we provide a prototype for evaluatin
g the lifelong learning generated by modern day teaching methods. While we
concur with other researchers that there are communal benefits from a degre
e, we also conclude that there is a huge variation in the long-term effects
of a course on a relatively homogeneous group of students. The variation c
omes from four main sources: (i) individual student backgrounds; (ii) diffe
rent reconstructions of the same academic experience; (iii) the different p
ersonal circumstances while at college; and (iv) the effects of individual
careers after graduation (which in turn leads to further individual reconst
ructions). These findings have three major implications for higher educatio
n policy: (i) evaluation can benefit by changing its major focus from indiv
idual courses to the whole college experience; (ii) there is value in looki
ng at the long-term impact of that college experience; and (iii) all teachi
ng and evaluation should respect the huge differences between individuals o
n the same course. These findings challenge any teaching method, course com
parison or policy implication which treats students as a homogeneous group.