Conventional two-dimensional (2-D) ultrasound is the standard method for th
e investigation of thyroid morphology. Volume calculations need model assum
ptions and are observer dependent. The present study per formed with a comm
ercially available three-dimensional (3-D) system Freescan added to a conve
ntional ultrasound scanner compares the accuracy of conventional thyroid vo
lumetry to several methods of 3-D volume determination. In vitro measuremen
ts were performed on thyroid phantoms with known volumes. The standard devi
ation of the normalized differences was 8.0% (3-D segmentation) and 10.5% (
conventional). For the accuracy of volume determination in human thyroids w
e performed a postmortem study. The thyroid volume was calculated conventio
nally by the ellipsoid model and by two 3-D methods (segmentation and the n
ewly developed multiplanar volume approximation). The reference volume was
determined after resection by submersion. The standard deviation of the nor
malized differences was 26.9% for the conventional method, 9.7% for 3-D seg
mentation and 11.5% for the multiplanar volume approximation, showing signi
ficant better results for both 3-D methods and no significant difference be
tween the 3-D methods. The 3-D system, therefore, achieves a better accurac
y for thyroid volumetry than the conventional volumetry using planar images
. In addition, the 3-D images are stored electronically and can be used for
follow-up studies.