Proponents of the spatial mismatch hypothesis argue that job decentralisati
on harms low-income residents of central cities because of barriers that li
mit their access to suburban labour markets. Such barriers can take the for
m of housing discrimination, exclusionary zoning or long and difficult comm
utes. This paper uses an urban equilibrium model of spatial mismatch to ana
lyse the impact of commuting subsidies on the welfare of low-income, centra
l-city households with restricted mobility. Specifically, it seeks to deter
mine how effective such subsidies are at reducing the welfare impact of spa
tial mismatch. While subsidised outward commuting is found to raise the wel
fare of the low-income households, the welfare gains are only a small porti
on of the welfare loss due to spatial mismatch.