Aa. Bridi et al., Efficacy of a long-acting formulation of ivermectin against Psoroptes ovis(Hering, 1838) on cattle, VET PARASIT, 97(4), 2001, pp. 277-283
A study was conducted in cattle experimentally infested with Psoroptes avis
to compare the prophylactic control against P. ovis provided by a long-act
ing injectable formulation of ivermectin to that of a commercially availabl
e injectable formulation of doramectin. Thirty Holstein steers were used. A
nimals were allocated by restricted randomization based on Day 0 body weigh
t, forming six replicates of five animals each. Within each replicate, one
animal was randomly allocated to one of the following treatment groups, wit
h ivermectin and doramectin administered subcutaneously where indicated: (1
) untreated controls; (2) ivermectin long-acting injectable (LAI) 630 mcg/k
g, 56 days before challenge; (3) ivermectin LAI 630 mcg/kg, 42 days before
challenge; (4) ivermectin LAI 630 mcg/kg, 35 days before challenge; or (5)
doramectin 200 mcg/kg, 35 days before challenge. Animals were housed in ind
ividual pens 1 week prior to treatment. All animals were experimentally inf
ested with P. ovis mites in the area between the shoulders, on the same day
. Live mites were counted in scrapings from mange lesions at 2 sites on eac
h animal 14, 21 and 28 days after challenge. Live mites were found in 33, 6
7 and 83% of the untreated controls on each respective evaluation. No P. ov
is mites were found in steers treated with ivermectin LAT. Those animals sh
owed lower (P < 0.05) mite counts than untreated controls an evaluations co
nducted 21 and 28 days after challenge. These results indicate that the ive
rmectin long-acting injectable formulation prevents induced infestations by
P. ovis for at least 56 days after treatment. Doramectin injectable formul
ation, used at 200 mcg/kg, did not have a prophylactic effect 35 days after
treatment. (C) 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.