The authors sought to determine the following: (1) How rigorous are the cur
rent resource allocation methods wed by Virginia's five regional Ryan White
CARE (Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency) Act Title II consortia? (2)
How useful are existing databases in allocating resources? (3) Is it feasib
le to introduce a standardised performance measurement approach for state-l
evel assessment of consortia effectiveness
The authors reviewed proposals and progress reports from each of the consor
tia to the Virginia public health agency; they then visited each of the con
sortia to solicit information to refine the study questions and to review t
he consortia's databases. The authors reviewed the literature on existing m
odels used to allocate resources, and surveyed members of the Virginia cons
ortia about how they used various resource allocation tools, how effective
these tools were, and how ready the consortia were to be evaluated regardin
g resource allocation.
The authors found no uniform process for the allocation of Title II funds i
n Virginia. Consortia members who felt connected and involved with their co
nsortium were significantly more knowledgeable about its operations and mor
e likely to consider it effective. A consortium's we of a continuous qualit
y improvement (CRI) approach to allocating resources was strongly associate
d with its members' perception that the consortium was effective.
Statewide performance and/or outcome measures cannot be set without some st
andardized expectations for performance. To do this, some expectations for
basic resource allocation procedures must be established. Three of Virginia
's five consortia will make use of this study's instrumentation in their ne
xt resource allocation processes, and, if their experiences are useful, a s
tatewide process may be established. If a statewide process is established,
regional consortia must continue to be able to determine local needs and t
o respond with locally appropriate service planning.