Down the years there have been many clinical reports of exquisite sensitivi
ty to low doses of food allergens. There are many factors that may contribu
te to a variation of threshold in an individual exposed to an allergen duri
ng the course of his or her daily life. Some of these factors are intrinsic
and unavoidable. Other factors map be predictable but not easily controlla
ble, such as asthma, exposure to allergens during the pollen season and pre
dicting situations that may be risky. Other factors may be out of the contr
ol of the individual. The most important one of these is the adequate train
ing and awareness of manufacturers and caterers who aim to provide safe and
nutritious meals to their allergic and nonallergic customers alike. Clinic
al histories of reactions in the community and the use of labial exposure d
uring food challenge show that most non-ingestion exposures to peanut usual
ly result in easily treated minor reactions. Formal, oral food challenges h
ave shown that low dose reactivity is relatively common but studies have no
t yet had the power to investigate whether peanut allergy is more commonly
associated with very low dose reactivity than other foods. This means that
industry must not concentrate only on peanut and tree nuts when looking at
issues of contamination just because they are associated with the majority
of severe reactions. There are more milk and egg allergic children in the g
eneral population and they deserve the same protection from allergen exposu
re as sufferers of peanut or tree nut allergies.