MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: Comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences
S. Naganawa et al., MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: Comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences, AM J NEUROR, 22(6), 2001, pp. 1179-1185
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR cisternography has been used as the noninvasive
screening tool of the cerebellopontine angle. The purpose of this study was
to directly compare two currently dominant types of sequences for heavily
T2-weighted MR cisternography.
METHODS: Three-dimensional fast asymmetric spin-echo (3D-FASE) sequences, w
hich are 3D half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement and
3D constructive interference in the steady-state (3D-CISS) sequences, were
compared on a clinical 1.5-T MR unit using the same scan times. In five hea
lthy volunteers, the contrast-to-noise ratio (CN) between CSF and the cereb
ellum was measured at three locations. Then, for qualitative analysis, the
quality of the labyrinth was scored on the original source multiplanar refo
rmatted images, the virtual endoscopic images, and the maximum intensity pr
ojection (MIP) images. In 20 consecutive patients with suspected cerebellop
ontine angle tumors, visualization of the tumors was evaluated using 3D con
trast-enhanced spoiled gradient-echo imaging as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Both sequences showed comparable mean C/N values; however, in qual
itative analysis, the scores for 3D-CISS on the source, virtual endoscopic,
and MIP images were significantly lower than those on the images obtained
with 3D-FASE, owing to more prominent flow and magnetic susceptibility arti
facts on the 3D-CISS sequences. In all subjects, discontinuity of the semic
ircular canals was seen on the virtual endoscopic and MIP images obtained w
ith 3D-CISS, owing to susceptibility artifacts, but not on those obtained w
ith 3D-FASE. All 12 tumors were detected by both sequences, but 3D-CISS gav
e one false-positive result.
CONCLUSION: 3D-FASE is considered the method of choice because artifacts ar
e reduced and specificity is increased.