We develop an informational theory that analyzes conditions under which a r
eelection-seeking executive will act in the public interest. The theory con
siders factors such as executive competence, challenger quality. and the li
kelihood that voters will learn the consequences of policy decisions before
an upcoming election. We find that an executive who has information sugges
ting that a popular policy is contrary to voters' interests may or may not
pander to voters by choosing it under certain conditions, the executive can
actually increase his probability of reelection by choosing an unpopular p
olicy that is in the public interest. However, we also show that an executi
ve will sometimes face electoral incentives to enact a policy that is both
unpopular and contrary to voters' interests. Our theory is illustrated with
examples involving President Abraham Lincoln, California Governor Earl War
ren, and President Gerald Ford.