Work and honor in the law: Prestige and the division of lawyers' labor

Two theories compete to explain the distribution of professional prestige a mong lawyers. Each theory arises our of a general theory of the social orga nization of the legal profession. Their disagreement centers on the source of the values that underlie lawyers' prestige order and on the aspects of t he division of labor that are consequently salient in determining prestige. The client-type thesis holds that the profession is organized largely by i ts relationships with its clients, and so lawyers esteem service to sociall y powerful clients. The professional purity thesis holds that the professio n is organized around a core of abstract knowledge, and so lawyers esteem w ork that is "professionally pure," in the sense of being free of non-legal considerations. Analyses of prestige judgments from a contemporary sample o f lawyers in the city of Chicago reveal that some of lawyers' professional values are intrinsic to the profession, as predicted by the professional pu rify thesis. Lawyers' esteem for professionally pure work complements their tendency to derogate service to people-especially those with little wealth or power-and to esteem service to large, powerful, and wealthy organizatio ns.