Je. Barone et al., Routine perioperative pulmonary artery catheterization has no effect on rate of complications in vascular surgery: A meta-analysis, AM SURG, 67(7), 2001, pp. 674-679
Despite widespread use pulmonary artery catheterization has not been proven
to reduce complications or mortality. One study supported the use of routi
ne preoperative pulmonary artery catheterization in moderate-risk vascular
surgery patients; several other studies have reported that pulmonary artery
catheterization is not efficacious. Our goal was to scrutinize the data us
ing meta-analysis. This is a systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE w
as searched for all articles on pulmonary artery catheterization, optimizat
ion, oxygen delivery, and preoperative preparation of vascular surgery pati
ents. Data from papers judged appropriate for inclusion were analyzed using
a computer program, Easy MA. Complications were defined as only those that
could have reasonably have been prevented by or resulted from pulmonary ar
tery catheterization. Of hundreds of possible papers only four were found t
o be adequate randomized prospective studies with similar exclusions, thera
peutic endpoints, and interpretable complication and mortality rates. Contr
ols included 174 patients versus 211 in the protocol group. Power analysis
showed that the combined sample sizes were adequate. The meta-analysis demo
nstrates that the studies are homogeneous. The use of a pulmonary artery ca
theter does not prevent morbidity or mortality. Of the studies providing da
ta on the amount of intravenous fluid administered three reported that stat
istically significantly more fluid was given to patients who underwent pulm
onary artery catheterization. Meta-analysis indicates that in moderate-risk
vascular surgery patients routine preoperative pulmonary artery catheteriz
ation is not associated with improved outcomes.