Many different cell types have been used to generate nuclear transfer embry
os and fetuses. However, little is known about the potential of fibroblasts
derived from a nuclear transfer fetus as donor cells for nuclear transfer.
The ability of cloned fetuses or animals to be cloned themselves is of gre
at interest in determining whether successive generations of clones remain
normal or accumulate genetic or phenotypic abnormalities. We generated a bo
vine fibroblast cell line from a cloned fetus, that continued to divide bey
ond 120 days (94 doublings,18 passages) in continuous culture. As long-term
survival of cells in culture is a desirable characteristic for use in tran
sgenic cell production, passage 2 and 18 cells were compared as donor cells
for nuclear transfer (NT). When cells from passage 2 (2 weeks in culture)
and passage 18 (4 months in culture) were used for nuclear transfer, there
was no significant difference in development rate to blastocyst (35.3 versu
s 44.6%, P = 0.07). A greater proportion of late passage cells were in G0/G
1 whether under serum-fed (64 versus 56%, P < 0.01) or serum-starved (95 ve
rsus 88%, P < 0.01) culture conditions. Following embryo transfer, equivale
nt day 30 pregnancy rates were observed for each group (P 2:2/19 versus P 1
8: 2/13). A slightly retarded fetus was surgically removed at day 56 and th
e remaining three fetuses died in utero by day 60 of gestation. Our results
show that fibroblast cells derived from regenerated cloned fetuses are cap
able of both in vitro and in vivo development. The longevity of this regene
rated cell line would allow more time for genetic manipulations and then to
identify stable transfected cells prior to their use as NT donor cells. Al
though no live fetuses were produced in this study the results provide enco
uraging data to show that a cloned fetus can itself be recloned to produce
another identical cloned fetus. Further studies on this and other recloned
fetuses are necessary to determine whether the failure to produce live offs
pring was a result of inadequate sample size or due to the cell type select
ed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.