Study objective: Flexion-extension (F/E) radiographs of the cervical spine
are often used in patients with blunt trauma when the evaluating physician
remains concerned about bony or ligamentous injuries despite negative or no
ndiagnostic standard radiographs. The use of this approach has never been a
ddressed in a large prospective study. We sought to determine the clinical
factors associated with ordering F/E views and the incidence of diagnostic
F/E films in patients with a normal 3-view cervical spine series.
Methods: Patients with blunt trauma selected for radiographic cervical spin
e imaging at 21 participating institutions in the National Emergency X-Radi
ography Utilization Study project under went standard 3-view (cross-table l
ateral, anteroposterior, and odontoid views) series, as well as any other i
maging deemed necessary by their physicians. Injuries detected by means of
screening radiography were then compared with final injury status for each
patient, as determined by review of all radiographic studies. Patients who
underwent F/E views were analyzed separately.
Results: Of 818 patients ultimately found to have cervical spine injury, 86
(10.5%) underwent F/E testing. Two patients sustained stable bony injuries
detected only on F/E views. Four other patients had a subluxation detected
only on F/E views, but all had other injuries apparent on routine cervical
spine imaging.
Conclusion: F/E imaging adds little to the acute evaluation of patients wit
h blunt trauma. Other approaches, including magnetic resonance imaging, com
puted tomography, or delayed F/E, in the presence of specific clinical conc
erns would seem to provide a more reasonable approach to adjunctive imaging
.