Diagnostic use of physicians' detection of urine fluorescence in a simulated ingestion of sodium fluorescein-containing antifreeze

Citation
Kl. Wallace et al., Diagnostic use of physicians' detection of urine fluorescence in a simulated ingestion of sodium fluorescein-containing antifreeze, ANN EMERG M, 38(1), 2001, pp. 49-54
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
ISSN journal
01960644 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
49 - 54
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-0644(200107)38:1<49:DUOPDO>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Study objective: We sought to assess physicians' ability to accurately dete rmine the presence or absence of sodium fluorescein (SF) in urine at a conc entration corresponding to that present after ingestion of a toxic amount o f commercial automotive antifreeze. Methods: We studied 2 different urine specimen evaluation formats-one prese nting isolated specimens, and the other presenting specimens grouped for co mparison-to determine whether the visual clues afforded by grouped comparis on aided the accuracy of the evaluation. On each study day, 3 urine specime ns (1 control specimen obtained before SF administration and 2 specimens ob tained after SF administration) were obtained from each of 9 or 10 voluntee rs. Each of these 27 or 30 urine specimens were presented sequentially and in random order to 2 emergency physicians during separate evaluation time p eriods. Each physician was asked to classify each specimen as fluorescent o r nonfluorescent (sequential format). After a rest period, each physician, again separately, was asked to look at the same 27 or 30 urine specimens, t his time all together in a test tube rack so that grouped comparisons were possible. The physicians again classified each sample as either fluorescent or nonfluorescent (grouped format). We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the evaluation by each presentation format (sequential or g rouped). Results: Mean examiner sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting the presence of SF in urine using the sequential presentation format were 35%, 75%, and 48%, respectively, whereas the same test performance indices were 42%, 66%, and 50%, respectively, when the grouped format was used. Conclusion: Wood's lamp determination of urine fluorescence is of limited d iagnostic utility in the detection of SF ingestion in an amount equivalent to toxic ingestion of some ethylene glycol-containing automotive antifreeze products.