Impacts of an irrigation and hydroelectric scheme in a stream with a high rate of diadromy (Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles): Can downstream alterations affect upstream faunal assemblages?

Citation
E. Fievet et al., Impacts of an irrigation and hydroelectric scheme in a stream with a high rate of diadromy (Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles): Can downstream alterations affect upstream faunal assemblages?, ARCH HYDROB, 151(3), 2001, pp. 405-425
Citations number
47
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
ARCHIV FUR HYDROBIOLOGIE
ISSN journal
00039136 → ACNP
Volume
151
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
405 - 425
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9136(200106)151:3<405:IOAIAH>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
In order to determine whether downstream alterations may affect upstream fa unal assemblages in streams dominated by diadromous species we sampled deca pods and fish by electrofishing before (1991-1992) and after (1994-1998) th e completion of an irrigation and hydroelectric scheme on the Grand-Carbet River, a typical fast-flowing stream of Guadeloupe, Lesser Antilles. Water abstraction occurred at a low-head dam (i.e. valley dam) at 230 m a.s.l. We investigated three study sites downstream of the dam at 15, 100 and 200 me tres a.s.l. (respectively Sites 1 to 3) and two sites upstream at 436 and 5 40 metres a.s.l. (respectively Sites 4 and 5). The completion of the irriga tion and hydroelectric scheme reduced the proportions of large-bodied carni vorous fish and decapod species at both downstream altered and upstream una ltered sites. Inversely the proportions of the small-bodied species signifi cantly increased. At downstream sites the faunal assemblages (guild structu re and taxon diversity) were more impacted at Site 2 where water depth decr eased most (-25 cm) than at Site 3 where water depth was least changed (-10 cm). An intermediate response was recorded at Site 1. At upstream sites th e faunal assemblages were more modified at Site 4, i.e. the site closest to the dam, than at Site 5, i.e. the highest site. Faunal changes were more o r less marked among sites, probably in relation to the degree of physical c hanges at downstream sites, and to distances from the dam at upstream sites .