Two generations of a climate model are compared using the impact of a CO2 d
oubling on the Hudson Bay region as the means of diagnosing differences in
model performance. Surface temperature, precipitation, sea-ice coverage, an
d permafrost distribution are compared. The most striking difference is the
response of the sea ice in the two models. In the coupled atmosphere-ocean
climate model, sea ice virtually disappears in Hudson Bay. This leads to a
substantially higher regional temperature response. We suggest that conduc
tivity of sea ice and thermal diffusivity of seawater are key factors that
cause the difference in sea-ice response. It is recommended that a regional
model be developed to produce more representative climate change scenarios
for the Hudson Bay region.