This article analyzes usage of a common property resource, "the commons," u
nder collectivization as compared with more familiar privatization institut
ional arrangements. Particular emphasis is on majority decision rules. When
separate majority coalitions may authorize simultaneous usage of a common
resource total value is dissipated, but the interdependencies introduced by
possible membership in differing coalitions to an extent reduce the incent
ives for exploitation. The formal analysis is analogous to that familiar in
Cournot-Nash duopoly-oligopoly models but with differing efficiency implic
ations. The argument has relevance for differential-benefit public spending
from general tax sources, as well as other applications.