Objective: To evaluate the outcome of aortic root augmentation by the Konno
-aortoventriculoplasty technique as part of reoperative aortic valve replac
ement. Methods: Since 1983, 15 patients, 12 males and three females, had re
peat aortic valve replacement (AVR) with concomitant Konno aortoventriculop
lasty. Age ranged from 1.2 to 18 years (mean 12.5 years). The underlying an
atomic diagnoses were valve and subvalvar aortic stenosis in 11, truncal va
lve insufficiency in one, endocarditis in one, Shone's complex in one and s
evere aortic insufficiency associated with a ventricular septal defect in o
ne patient. All patients had had previous AVR. The causes for reoperation w
ere prosthetic valve stenosis due to growth in ten and paravalvular leak in
one, homograft failure in two, xenograft failure in one, and left ventricu
lar outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) after mitral valve replacement in one
patient. The mean size of explanted prostheses was 19.2 min (13-23 mm) whi
le the mean size of the implanted prostheses was 24.3 mm (19-27 mm) (P < 0.
01). Previous aortic root enlargement had been performed in 11 patients in
conjunction with AVR. The Manougian technique was used previously in two, K
onno aortoventriculoplasty in eight, and both techniques in one patient, Th
e newly implanted aortic valves were a homograft in one patient and mechani
cal prostheses in 14 patients. Results: There was one operative death (1 of
15 or 6.6%) in a 17.5 year old patient with previous AVR and posterior roo
t enlargement, due to low cardiac output state. Follow-up ranged from 6 mon
ths to 17 years (mean 7.2 years). The only late death occurred in an 11.6-y
ear-old patient due to prosthetic valve endocarditis. Two patients had comp
lete heart block and had permanent pacemaker insertion (2 of 15 or 13.3%).
One patient had pulmonary valve replacement because of combined stenosis an
d insufficiency 5 years after operation. All 13-surviving patients are asym
ptomatic at latest follow up. Conclusion: Konno aortoventriculoplasty with
repeat AVR may be safely performed. Excellent results may be achieved despi
te previous aortic root enlargement. It is a good surgical option For compl
ex LVOTO and may even reduce reoperation in children by allowing placement
of a larger prosthesis. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.