This article uncovers some crucial key assumptions of polity-formation unde
rpinning the debate about the European Union's democratic legitimacy. It us
es theories of nationalism to understand why a demos is unlikely to develop
easily at the European level. Based on a two-by-two categorization of the
logic and scope of identity-formation, I conclude that the: most promising
approach to European demos-formation conceives of identities as both constr
ucted and 'sticky'. Labeling this theoretical position 'bounded integration
', I suggest that it provides a more realistic foundation for developing de
mocracy-enhancing reform proposals than does post-nationalist theorizing, e
specially due to the former's explicit attention to identity-conferring mec
hanisms such as education, language and media.