Four different radiological diagnostic methods were compared as to their di
agnostic relevance in the analysis of odontoid fractures. Thirty-one patien
ts with fresh odontoid fractures were investigated using standard anteropos
terior and lateral radiographs, conventional tomography, axial computerized
tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction in the sagittal and the coro
nal planes. As a control, 13 patients without odontoid fractures were exami
ned. The results of the different investigations were correlated with the a
ctual (clinical and/or intra-operative) findings. The coefficients of corre
lation for the conventional tomography and two-dimensional reconstruction w
ere kappa =0.774 and kappa =0.907, respectively. For conventional radiograp
hy and axial computerized tomography (CT), the coefficients were clearly lo
wer, at kappa =0.364 and kappa =0.627, respectively. The less time-consumin
g CT examination with sagittal and coronal reconstructions is equivalent wi
th respect to diagnostic accuracy and can, therefore, replace conventional
tomography in the evaluation of odontoid fractures.