Systemic mycophenolate mofetil in comparison with systemic cyclosporin A in high-risk keratoplasty patients: 3 years' results of a randomized prospective clinical trial
T. Reinhard et al., Systemic mycophenolate mofetil in comparison with systemic cyclosporin A in high-risk keratoplasty patients: 3 years' results of a randomized prospective clinical trial, GR ARCH CL, 239(5), 2001, pp. 367-372
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Optalmology
Journal title
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Background: With the use of systemic cyclosporin A (CsA), graft prognosis a
fter high-risk penetrating keratoplasty has improved considerably. However,
the application of CsA is limited owing to a variety of severe side effect
s. In this prospectively randomized study mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a sa
fe and efficient immunosuppressive medication after renal transplantation,
was compared with CsA after high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Methods: Tw
enty-nine high-risk keratoplasty patients were treated with MMF 2 x 1 g dai
ly; another 27 patients received CsA, aiming at blood trough levels of 120-
150 ng/ml. Systemic immunosuppression was scheduled for 6 months. In both g
roups oral corticosteroids (fluocortolone 1 mg/kg) were administered for 3
weeks postoperatively. Results: During the first year after operation, no g
raft failure was recorded. Two years postoperatively 92%/82% and 3 years po
stoperatively 74%/69% of grafts were clear in the MMF and CsA group, respec
tively (Kaplan Meier P=0.33, log-rank test). In total, two graft failures w
ere recorded in the MMF group and four in the CsA group. Three years postop
eratively 53% of the grafts were rejection-free in the MMF group and 73% in
the CsA group (Kaplan Meier P=0.46, log-rank test). Eight endothelial immu
ne reactions were observed in the MMF group (three under systemic immunosup
pression/five thereafter; six mild/two severe) and five in the CsA group (t
hree under systemic immunosuppression/two thereafter; three mild/two severe
). Side effects occurred in six patients under MMF and 11 under CsA. Conclu
sions: Concerning efficacy, no statistically significant difference between
systemic MMF and systemic CsA administered for 6 months after high-risk pe
netrating keratoplasty could be shown. Systemic MMF was proven to be at lea
st as safe as CsA. The main mechanism in improving graft survival is a shif
t from severe to milder endothelial immune reactions, as already demonstrat
ed for CsA. Thus, MMF may become an alternative to CsA for immunosuppressio
n after penetrating high-risk keratoplasty. About 2 years postoperatively,
pharmacologically induced relative immunological tolerance slowly decreases
. Therefore, longterm administration of systemic MMF should be evaluated in
further studies.