This nonexperimental effectiveness study attempted to evaluate the utility
of a brief waiting-list group. The settling was a university clinic providi
ng treatment for an inner-city population. Health delivery and staff dynami
cs made it difficult to conduct clinical research in this treatment-oriente
d setting. The nonrandom design allowed for patient choice, with few client
s attending more than two group sessions, thus decreasing its impact. Manag
ed-care pressures decreased staff cooperation with our research objectives,
resulting in very low return rates in testing and follow-up data. A social
systems analysis, highlighting staff and institutional ambivalence, is use
d to understand the failure to adequately test the effectiveness of waiting
-list group therapy. Recommendations are offered to investigators who conte
mplate conducting clinical research with limited resources.