H. Hartley et al., Effect of lateral versus supine wedged position on development of spinal blockade and hypotension, INT J OB AN, 10(3), 2001, pp. 182-188
Aortocaval compression may not be completely prevented by the supine wedged
ol tilted positions. It is commonly believed, however, that the unmodified
full lateral position after induction of spinal anaesthesia might allow ex
cessive spread of the block. We therefore compared baseline arterial pressu
res in the supine wedged, sitting, tilted and full lateral positions in 40
women who were about to undergo elective caesarean section. They were then
given spinal anaesthesia in the left lateral position and randomised to be
turned to the right lateral or the supine wedged position, after which spee
d of onset and spread of blockade to cold sensation were measured every 2 m
in for 10 min and mean arterial pressure and ephedrine requirement were rec
orded every minute for 20 min. Baseline mean arterial pressure was 9 mmHg (
95% CI 3 to 14) lower in the left lateral (measured in the upper arm) than
in the sitting position; those in the supine wedged and tilted positions we
re intermediate. Following spinal anaesthesia, hypotension (defined as a re
ading less than or equal to 80% of the baseline value in the same position)
lasted 2.4 min longer (CI +0.6 to +4.1) in the supine wedged group, but th
ere was no significant difference between the groups in maximum fall or eph
edrine requirement. The upper level of block rose more rapidly in the supin
e wedged than in the lateral group and showed less variability. There is th
erefore no reason to fear the unmodified lateral group position, which may
offer better protection against hypotension. (C) 2001 Harcourt Publishers L
td.