Teachers traditionally have used analogies as explanatory tools in bridging
the gap between new and preexisting knowledge. In two studies, I examine t
he impact of analogies in teaching undergraduates conceptual applications o
f developmental psychology theories. In Study 1, I generate analogies refle
cting each theory; in Study 2, I use both teacher- and student-generated an
alogies. Students' attitudes toward analogy-enhanced instruction were predo
minantly favorable. Teacher-generated-analogy (TGA) and student-generated-a
nalogy (SGA) learning conditions performed significantly better than a no-a
nalogy control group in understanding and applying developmental theories.
Because learning becomes more active and interactive when students create t
heir own analogies and share them with classmates and the instructor as par
t of in-class discussion and critique, the SGA learning condition similarly
outperformed the TGA learning condition. In line with a constructionist mo
del of teaching and learning, psychological explanations, educational appli
cations, and implications for future research are discussed.